[Euro 2016] Groupe B
Flux RSS 35 messages · 6.950 lectures · Premier message par rcsforever · Dernier message par rcsforever
-
rcsforeverEffectifs, calendrier, prévisions pour le groupe B.
Angleterre
Russie
Galles
Slovaquie
http://www.lequipe.fr/Football/FootballResultatGroupe6998.html -
26 Anglais
Gardiens : Hart (Manchester City), Forster (Southampton), Heaton (Burnley).
Défenseurs : Bertrand (Southampton), Cahill (Chelsea), Clyne (Liverpool), Walker (Tottenham), Rose (Tottenham), Smalling (Manchester United), Stones (Everton).
Milieux : Alli (Tottenham), Barkley (Everton), Delph (Manchester City), Dier (Tottenham), Drinkwater (Leicester), Henderson (Liverpool), Lallana (Liverpool), Milner (Liverpool), Sterling (Manchester City), Townsend (Newcastle), Wilshere (Arsenal).
Attaquants : Kane (Tottenham), Rashford (Manchester United), Rooney (Manchester United), Sturridge (Liverpool), Vardy (Leicester).
3 milieux devraient sauter, voire le petit Rashford.
Absents : Butland, Welbeck, Oxlade-Chamberlain (blessés), Walcott -
L'Angleterre qui fêtera les 50 ans de son unique trophée cette année, on ne sait jamais...
-
Bon, on va voir ce soir si nos amis anglais en ont dans la culotte ou non à présent, avec un test intéressant face à des russes qui préparent leur CM. Le premier (choc..) de cet Euro.
-
Première (petite) surprise de l'Euro avec la victoire du Pays de Galles contre la Slovaquie..
-
Surprise pas vraiment, sur le papier c'était un match équilibré (qui l'a été d'ailleurs), les grosses individualités ont eu du mal sur ce match, notamment Ramsey (je l'adore mais sur ce match c'était vraiment mauvais) et Skrtl. Bale a marqué mais n'a pas très bien joué, Hamsik c'était un peu mieux que les autres.
Allez je table sur une victoire de la Russie face aux anglais. -
Cote à 3 (au minimum) pour le Pays de Galles avant la rencontre. Chez les bookmakers c'est une surprise en tout cas.
-
J'aurais du les jouer !
-
Quel plaisir de vivre les matchs de l'Euro en lisant le minute-par-minute du Guardian en meme temps qu'on visionne la rencontre.
Ce soir, vers la fin du match, le mec cite Liam Murray critiquant le choix de faire jouer les corners par Kane (a ce moment la, les russes n'avaient pas egalise) :
Citation: “The decision to put Kane on corners does seem a bit like an ageing guitar band doing a synth album to try to make themselves look cool when they should just stick with guitars. Pretty much summarises the last wasted decade for Radiohead,” writes Liam Murray. How dare you Liam. England are controlling the game well enough since the goal. Wilshere has shown a few nice touches and almost releases Lallana in the box. Kane is fouled by Glushakov. Kane to take the free-kick. Dier wanders over and whispers something to him. Presumably “I should be taking this. You’re not Gareth Bale”
Blourg
JPDarky -
Alors ça je n'ai toujours pas compris comment on pouvait faire tirer tous ses corners et une bonne partie des coup francs par son avant centre ... C'est hautement incompréhensible de mettre son meilleur artilleur en role de passeur.
Je veux bien croire qu'il y a de bon défenseur ou récupérateur capable de mettre des coups de tête salvateur, mais le coup de pied puissant, efficace et surtout naturel, c'est le boulot du 9.
Et au final, malgré le but anglais, qui reste une frappe direct, rares sont les centres qui auront inquiété les russes ... Qui ne sont quand même pas la défense la plus solide du monde, surtout vis à vis de l'armada anglaise. -
J'ai rarement vu une défense aussi mal alignée que celle de la Russie, ça me rappelle un peu les Rolando, Rekik ou Nkoulou à l'OM, comment l'Angleterre n'a pu mettre qu'un but ?
Sinon Rooney en 8 est inutile, même si là il a fait un bon match, contre les gros ça va se sentir. Ca reste et restera un 9, c'est là qu'il brille le plus. (surtout quand on voit le match de Kane)
Chapeau à la défense centrale russe et son capitaine Berezutski (un truc du genre, la phonétique est bonne au moins) qui tient tout le match et vient porter ses c******* pour égaliser. Bravo. -
Communique de la FSF
http://www.fsf.org.uk/latest-news/view/fsf-statement-attacks-on-english-fans-in-marseille-euro2016
Citation:
Following events in Marseille ahead of, and after, England's opening Euro 2016 game against Russia on Saturday the FSF has issued the following statement:
In Marseille, England fans were subjected to numerous pre-planned, organised and brutal attacks on several occasions in the days preceding the game against Russia, in the stadium itself, and after the match.
Dozens of England fans have been injured, some seriously. Many more, including women and children, have been affected by tear gas or water cannons deployed by the police. It has meant for many a very unpleasant beginning to what should be a thoroughly enjoyable carnival of football.
With a few honourable exceptions, the knee-jerk first response of many in the media and in politics has been once again to cast blame on us, lazily or to suit their own agenda falling back on out-of-date stereotypes about English hooligans abroad.
Whatever the history – and there has been plenty in years gone by which earned us a negative reputation – this time, those accusations are wide of the mark.
We’re not claiming that all England supporters are angels. While the big majority of us come and party in the real spirit of football, making new friends as we go, there are still a number among us who drink maybe more than is wise, or who sing songs that aren’t to everyone’s taste. But what we can say with confidence is that to the best of our knowledge, none of the many violent incidents that took place in Marseille during our time there were initiated by England fans.
We have witnessed groups coming together – sometimes Russian hooligans, sometimes Marseille ultras, sometimes simply gangs of local youths – with the deliberate aim of attacking England fans eating and drinking in and outside bars and restaurants or making our way to the game. Some of them have been tooled up, some of them have had their faces masked, but all of them have been intent on starting trouble and initiating violence.
The attacks have often been brutal, and in that context, we can hardly condemn those England fans who were left with little option but to defend themselves and in some cases their families. But of course those are often the images that end up on TV and are used out of context to demonise England fans. The media talk of “clashes” between fans, as if there were two groups determined to confront each other. That wasn’t what happened here.
These were cowardly attacks on groups that included families, on innocent people minding their own business and trying to enjoy the tournament. That kind of behaviour and its perpetrators have no place in football, and it’s with these people that the blame for the Marseille events clearly belongs.
That these attacks were allowed to happen at all raises crucial questions about the role of the French police. Surely the first responsibility of a police force in a country hosting a tournament is to make sure that those who have come to enjoy it can do so in safety, protected of course as far as possible from terrorism, but also from attacks by local thugs or visiting hooligans?
And yet we have witnessed these groups come together to prepare their assaults on crowds of fans while the police watch and let it happen. If they can see a potential problem developing before their eyes, why do they do nothing to stop them getting near their target?
Time after time, the first intervention of the French police has been to use tear gas and then water cannons. It’s in the nature of tear gas that it doesn’t discriminate between perpetrators and passers-by, between attackers and victims, and it often lands when the villains of the piece have already run off – leaving those who have just been attacked or in the vicinity with eyes stinging and streaming, and struggling to breathe.
The other consequence of this police approach is that while it may look dramatic and effective, with people running for cover, it actually leaves the hooligans free to fight again another day. None of them are arrested, they get to slope off and re-group ready for their next assault, or to travel to their next venue.
All the trouble on the streets of Marseille was then followed by the appalling scenes inside the ground at the end of the game: illegal pyrotechnics, a huge banger, political and far-right flags, and then finally the frontal assault on England fans in the adjacent blocks – a neutral sector containing also French fans and many family groups. All of it entirely unacceptable.
At Euro 2000, the England team were threatened with exclusion from the tournament because of the behaviour of our fans – and yet the problems we admittedly did generate then were small beer compared to what has unfolded with the Russian hooligans over the last few days.
We opposed the expulsion of England from Euro 2000 on the grounds that to expel the team would be to punish the majority of fans as much, and arguably even more, that the guilty minority – and we would argue the same principle applies to any threat to expel Russia from the tournament now. Any sanction should isolate and punish the perpetrators; the majority of fans are part of the solution, not the problem.
One significant difference however is that after Euro 2000 and that expulsion threat, there was a concerted effort in England, involving everyone across the game including government, police, the FA and fans’ organisations, to address the problems that we had. This resulted among other things in new laws and the creation of football banning orders, and it worked: the result has been, over time, a huge improvement in the behaviour and reputation of England fans, which has seen us rightly praised on more than one occasion for our contribution to a tournament’s atmosphere.
If Russia wants to be taken seriously as a football nation, competing in and indeed even hosting major international tournaments, then surely there has to be some serious action taken within Russia to stop their thug element carrying out these cowardly violent attacks? As things stand now, the prospect of a World Cup in Russia looks less appealing than ever.
Maybe that’s for the future. But now, with immediate effect, we need the French authorities to ensure that England fans are able to enjoy Euro 2016 in the carnival mood at which we excel, safe from aggression and encouraged to party.
See more at: http://www.fsf.org.uk/latest-news/view/fsf-statement-attacks-on-english-fans-in-marseille-euro2016#sthash.Yl2FxVss.dpuf
Blourg
JPDarky -
L'équipe d'Angleterre est prometteuse mais il y a un truc qui me chiffonne un peu : j'ai l'impression qu'ils préparent les épreuves de sprint des JO (surtout le 400m haies) plus qu'ils ne jouent au foot. C'est dommage car il y a vraiment de quoi faire.
-
Comme toutes les équipes habituées à perdre lorsque ça compte, l'Angleterre a besoin d'une victoire référence face à un (gros), pour véritablement croire en elle et franchir un cap mental. Si cette équipe arrive à prendre confiance il faudra alors s'en méfier pour de bon.
-
Ahah oui c'est vrai qu'il y a beaucoup de joueurs qu'on pourrait nommer "Tout droit" dans cette équipe, mais ils sont prometteurs !
-
Déjà à l'époque Gerrard, Lampard, Terry, Ferdinand, Carragher, Rooney, Ashley Cole et j'en passe ils gagnaient pas alors là...
Beaucoup de joueurs sont surcôtés (bon certes mais pas autant que l'on veut nous le faire croire). Ca manque de leader (à part Rooney) et de caractères. -
Oui c'est clair, et c'est moche à dire mais l'angleterre a toujours eu des bons joueurs mais n'a jamais rien fait ahah....
-
Douniama en rêvait, Sturridge l'a fait : une petite pichenette pourave a suffi à offrir la victoire aux Anglais face aux Gallois.
-
Elle peut faire du bien dans les têtes cette victoire, malgré une faible opposition. Par contre la Russie est au courant que sa CM se joue seulement dans deux ans ?
-
Ahah c'est vrai que pour la Russie c'est vraiment tendu si ils veulent tirer quelque chose de la CDM 2018.
Quand au match entre les deux pays anglophones, c'était limite je dirais -
Il reste un match mais face à la Slovaquie, ça faisait peine à voir.. On du mal à croire que cette équipe est en pleine préparation d'un événement majeur pour elle.
-
C'est clair, je pense la même chose, en tous cas, du coté russe j'ai l'impression que c'est plus un évènement politique que sportif
-
Angleterre-Galles, et pas une des deux équipes n'est fichue d'arborer un maillot rouge... Tout fout le camp.
-
Si cela avait été Galles-Angleterre, on aurait été quittes pour appeler le Kimberley FC !
-
La Slovaquie a ressorti le rideau de fer et contraint les Anglais au 0-0. Grâce à ce résultat, c'est le Pays de Galles qui termine 1er du groupe.
Il faut être inscrit et connecté pour ajouter un commentaire. Déjà inscrit ? Connectez-vous ! Sinon, inscrivez-vous.
